dead man walking

One thing a life in the world of intelligence and political punditry has taught me is not to make overly bold assessments. It’s always best to throw in words like ‘possibly’ or ‘probably’. Above all, one should avoid predictions. If you must predict, do so only in terms of probabilities. Don’t say ‘this will happen’, or ‘this won’t happen’; say ‘there’s an X% possibility of this happening’. Philip Tetlock’s research into social scientists’ ability to predict suggests that they are on average as accurate as a monkey rolling dice. I’ve been wrong enough times to know one thing about the future – it’s unknowable.

Consequently, I’m not going to tell you what the outcome of the current political crisis in Belarus will be. I was a student there for several months back in 1987, when it was still the Belorussian Soviet Socialist Republic, but I haven’t been back there since. I can’t pretend to know what’s going on in the mind of the average Belarusian, let alone the balance of political forces. Others, though, seem far more confident about what the days ahead have in store for us.

One example is Mark Galeotti, writing in the online US version of that once fine, but now long declining, magazine, The Spectator (fire Boris as Prime Minister and bring him back as editor would be my solution to both Britain’s woes and those of The Spectator). Belarusian president Alexander Lukashenko is a ‘dead man walking’ says Galeotti. Lukashenko’s ‘days are over’, he confidently adds.

Are they? Well, maybe. But maybe not. Galeotti thinks that Lukashenko may ‘hold on for now’, but that even if he does his legitimacy will be so undermined that ‘this is just delaying the inevitable’. I’m not so sure.

In the first place, many of the conditions for a successful revolution appear to be lacking in Belarus. In this regard, it’s worth comparing it with 2014 Ukraine. The Maidan revolution succeeded for many reasons, which included: wealthy financial backers; a cause capable of attracting the intellectual elites (EU membership – however unrealistic); a hardcore of well-organized muscle; and a weak president, who in contrast to the manner in which he was depicted, was very unwilling to take tough measures to defend himself. The Belarusian opposition lacks similar financial backers, the European cause, and the hardcore nationalist muscle. It also faces a president who gives every impression of being quite prepared to do whatever is required to stay in power.

In the second place, I’ve seen far too many examples of ‘dictatorial’ presidents who have been declared ‘dead men walking’, only to defy all predictions and not merely stay notionally in power, but remain very much in control of their countries. Predictions of Vladimir Putin’s demise appear almost monthly. The Bolotnaya protests of 2012 were meant to be his undoing. So were American and US sanctions. So was the collapse in the oil price. So too was COVID-19. And so on, and so forth. And yet, there he is, still in the Krenlin today, unchallenged and unchallengeable in terms of power.

Venezuelan president Nicolas Maduro is another example. He’s withstood economic collapse, coup attempts, and massive economic pressure from the some of the most powerful nations in the world. Compared with what he’s had to face, the protests in Belarus are chicken feed. If Maduro can hold on, Lukashenko surely can too.

That’s not to say that he will. Anything can happen, and I’m not going to predict. But confident assertions that his days are numbered strike me as misplaced. It would be very wrong to base any policies on the assumption either that Lukashenka will be driven out of power or that if he does retain power he will be seriously weakened. After all, people said the same about Putin in 2012.

At the end of his article, Galeotti makes the following remark:

Meanwhile, the European Union will condemn the violence and the fraud, but how far will it impose serious sanctions and otherwise try to bring Lukashenko down? Already this morning I’ve received an email from a contact at the EU’s External Action Service suspecting that his colleagues, while loudly condemning the repression, are crossing their fingers that Lukashenko will be able to regain control, so that they are not forced to address this dilemma.

It strikes me that Galeotti’s friends in the EU have their heads screwed on right. Again and again in recent years, we’ve seen Western states impose sanctions on disliked regimes in the belief that they will succeed in toppling governments, only to fail and achieve nothing other than the impoverishment of ordinary people. We shouldn’t commit the same mistake in the case of Belarus. If the regime falls, it will be because of the efforts of those ordinary people, not because of anything we do. And if it doesn’t, there will be nothing we can do about it. Assuming that Lukashenko is doomed, and acting on that assumption, is high stakes gambling. You might get lucky, but personally I’m not going to bet on it.

8 thoughts on “dead man walking”

  1. 2020 Belarus vs 2014 Ukraine: perhaps it’s worth noticing that Lukashenko, unlike Yanuk in 2014, still appears to be quite popular.

    Of course color revolutions are typically enacted by a small minority of activists in the capitol, but at least it doesn’t look like Lukashenko has to worry about loyalty of the army, law enforcement, security services, and all that. In other words, it’s a stable government (or stable ‘regime’, if you prefer). Or it seems stable to me, anyway.

    Like

  2. What happened in Ukraine should act as a Harsh lesson for anyone coming out on the streets in Belorussia.

    Ukraine is the second poorest country in Europe. What a sad outcome.

    The Ukrainian people if they could go back in time would not be supporting a Maidan!!!
    yanukovic wasn’t so bad compared to what replaced him. They elected Zelensky hoping he would be different but he is yet another oligarch puppet.

    Yanukovic should have fought -(just as Evo Morales should have stayed and fought not get on a plane to save himself) .

    I do not know much about President Lukashenko he is never in the British papers, but he should not give into people on the streets using the tactics of a colour revolution.

    He is accused of fixing the election, but the opposition I doubt very much whether they got more votes than him what do they stand for?

    What was there programme to improve the country?

    They don’t even have the (fake) promise of joining the EU like Ukraine!

    Like

  3. “If Maduro can hold on, Lukashenko surely can too.”

    And let us not forget the 100500% reliable “Assad must go” curse:

    “If the regime falls, it will be because of the efforts of those ordinary people, not because of anything we do”

    Hogwash. “The regime” will fall not because of the ambigous “people” (as if the liberals suddenly discovered previously unknown sympathy to the “deplorables” and hoi polloi of the world), but because of the elites. The appeal “to the people” is the most hypocritical thing any dye in the wool liberal (i.e. an elitist by design) can ever do.

    Like

  4. Again and again in recent years, we’ve seen Western states impose sanctions on disliked regimes in the belief that they will succeed in toppling governments, only to fail and achieve nothing other than the impoverishment of ordinary people.

    Curiously enough I pondered about that a couple of days ago. Now would I want to compare the US vs the (last update 03.08.2020) EU sanctions … 460 pages? Ok there is an alphabetical order. … As someone that doesn’t quite work directly in the field or assuming someone that indirectly has offers to those on the list might have? I guess, no.

    Like

    1. got further updates. Two at the same date. Apparently it ain’t that easy, administratively.

      Now admittedly, I had to log in and subscribe to those. But, well aware of the administrative side on matters, who is actually going as far as subscribe???? Mark Galeotti? I doubt?

      Or is he, both supporting or delivering ….???

      Like

  5. There is no functioning or viable opposition, which would be vital to ‘topple’ Lukashenko. The official opposition candidate did a runner at the first possible moment painting her (rightly or wrongly) as weak and in no way capable of serious opposition. Minimum interference from the US, UK et al also means that if Luka falls a power vacuum will exist most probably to be filled by the Military and the Belorussian KGB, I doubt anyone would prefer that. Its a small country with a small population but a very well (Russian) trained army and an efficient security services. Pretty sure Lukashenko will hold on but may feel he has to stop playing both sides (West Vs East) in the future. I suspect this is the message being sent loud and clear by Moscow as we speak. This can probably only work to Russias advantage to some extent. The US won’t do anything silly so close to an election … and really what can they do? Create another failed state as they’ve done with Ukraine which we’re all still paying for with our taxes? I think not.

    Like

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s