Patron-client relations

In any patron-client relationship, the client has some degree of independence. On occasion, the client may even be in a position to more or less control the patron. This is the case, for instance, when the client understands that the patron’s prestige is dependent on the client’s survival. In such circumstances, the client has the patron over a barrel; he can do as he pleases because he knows that patron will have to continue supporting him come what may.

Afghanistan provides a good example of how this works. In the 1980s, the leaders of the People’s Democratic Party of Afghanistan (PDPA) seemed to spend as much of their time squabbling with each other as with the mujahideen who were attempting to overthrow them. They pursued social and economic policies which their Soviet patrons often considered very ill-advised. Attempts by the Soviets to make them behave better never achieved very much. It was only when the Soviets made it clear that they were leaving that the PDPA under Najibullah began to get its act together even slightly. Similarly, we have seen in the last decade that although the current Afghan government is utterly dependent on American aid, the Americans aren’t able to control their Afghan clients, who appear to have a good understanding that they can get away with an awful lot and the supply of the American money will keep flowing. The Americans had the same problem in Vietnam: successive client governments did their own thing, in direct contradiction to American desires.

One can observe this dynamic at play in Ukraine. The Lugansk People’s Republic (LPR) is currently undergoing another of its occasional bouts of in-fighting, with forces of the LPR’s interior ministry taking to the streets against the republic’s president, Igor Plotnitsky, following Plotnitsky’s attempt to fire the interior minister, Igor Kornet. It’s hard to determine exactly what’s going on. Kornet claims not to be carrying out a coup, just to be acting against treacherous personnel, supposedly working for Kiev, in Plotnitsky’s entourage. Interior ministry forces are backing Kornet, while the military police and presidential guard are remaining loyal to Plotnitsky. Rumours abound that troops from the neighbouring Donetsk People’s Republic (DPR) have arrived, and are preparing to merge the LPR and DPR into one. The LPR army, meanwhile, is sitting the whole thing out.

In the Western press, the DPR and LPR are often portrayed as nothing more than Russian puppet states. But if this is the case, where are the puppet masters? It doesn’t look like the Russians are playing any role in what’s happening in Lugansk, and it would be strange if they were. Undoubtedly, the LPR and DPR are highly dependent on Russian aid. Yet, it stretches credibility a bit to imagine that the Russian government wants the LPR to be the chaotic mess that it is and is pulling all the strings in the current coup, or non-coup, or whatever it is. Like Afghanistan in the 1980s, the LPR is clearly seething with personal rivalries, and local dynamics drive much of what occurs. Local leaders have a lot of firepower at their disposal. The few Russian officials that may be present don’t. The clients have much more independence than one might imagine.

In short, these most recent events should caution us against assuming that Russia determines everything that happens in Donbass. Undoubtedly, Russia’s relationship with the DPR and LPR is one of patron and client. But the patron isn’t and never has been in full control of the client. Given the way that the leaders of the LPR behave, it would probably be better for all concerned if it was, but clearly it isn’t, and we have to accept this reality. This has important ramifications in terms of possible political settlements of the war in Ukraine, namely that if one doesn’t want Moscow to take full control of Donbass, then the interests of its clients there will have to be taken into consideration. Moscow will have to take them into consideration; it can’t just abandon them. And Kiev and the West will have to take them into consideration if they want to strike a deal, for the simple reason that they exist and have some degree of power and agency. It may not be pleasant, but that’s the way it is.

6 thoughts on “Patron-client relations”

  1. “Kornet claims not to be carrying out a coup…”

    … and he will go on saying so until the coup has succeeded.

    “Treason doth never prosper: what’s the reason?
    Why, if it prosper, none dare call it treason”.

    – Sir John Harrington (1561-1612) (Epigrams, Book iv. Ep. 5).


  2. “In short, these most recent events should caution us against assuming that Russia determines everything that happens in Donbass”.

    I never have assumed that, and – as I never read the Western mainstream media – I don’t expect that I shall ever start to assume it.

    When any people is threatened with genocide, it will defend itself to the best of its ability. There is no need for far-fetched hypotheses about evil Eastern masterminds.


  3. There’s a good chance that this is Moscow sanctioned – unlikely that the DNR would be involved otherwise.

    Plotnitsky has been a toxic leader who has pillaged his own republic and very likely been involved in the assassinations of LNR commanders to keep power (which were unconvincingly blamed on Ukrainian special forces). But evidently this served the interests of at least some of the “towers” in the Kremlin. Once it became clear Plotnitsky had graduated his way up to providing cover for a pro-Ukrainian spy network, it seems that even the idiots (or traitors) in the Kremlin decided that something needed to be done – three years late, to be sure, but better than never.

    In the best case scenario this paves the way for a unification of the DNR/LNR into Novorossiya, but optimism is unwarranted.


    1. If the Kremlin really wanted Plotnitsky gone, there would surely be simpler and less chaotic methods of doing it than this. The LPR has always resembled a bit of a mobocracy to me, and this seems to be in keeping with that. But who knows?


  4. It is indeed hard to work out what is going on in LPR.

    All the usual sources are unclear.

    However whatever it is – is not to the advantage of the republic.

    If it is not resolved in a week or so then it is a problem.
    Wait and see


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s