Bad legislation

A lot of bad legislation has been floating around the world’s parliaments lately.

First up is a bill before the Russian Duma to decriminalize certain acts of domestic violence. As The Independent explains, if the law is passed:

… battering a spouse or child will become punishable by a fine of less than $500, a nominal 15 days of ‘administrative arrest’, or community service. Only broken bones or concussion, or repeated offences, would lead to criminal charges.

The bill  follows a Supreme Court ruling and previous legislation which seemed to punish violence within families more heavily than violence committed by non-family members. In seeking to rectify this apparent discrepancy, the bill’s drafters have gone rather too far, however.

Commenting on the bill, Vladimir Putin distanced himself from its provisions. ‘Look, it’s better not to spank children and not to cite any traditions as justification. There’s too little distance between a spanking and a beating’, he said. But he added that, ‘unceremonious interference with the family is impermissible.’

This would suggest that the legislation is not Putin’s idea, and that he doesn’t much like it, but also that he isn’t inclined to use his authority to stop it. That in turn rather undermines the theory that everything which happens in Russia is due to Putin’s personal initiative. It also suggests that Russia is perhaps a bit more ‘democratic’ than often claimed. But at the same time, it’s not a ‘liberal’ democracy, and if it were even more democratic, it might actually be even less liberal.

Second up is a bill introduced in the Ukrainian Rada by 33 deputies from a variety of political parties, including the ruling Poroshenko Bloc. If passed, this would strengthen the position of Ukrainian as the country’s sole official language. As Vzgliad explains, the bill restricts the use of Russian language to 10% of total output on TV and radio, and

… would make the use of Ukrainian obligatory in all spheres of state and social life, and also in the mass media. The document proposes a total Ukrainization – the Ukrainian vernacular would become mandatory for the organs of state power and for education, teaching in universities will be exclusively in Ukrainian … All mass cultural undertakings would be obliged to take place exclusively in the state language. Theatrical shows in other languages would have to have Ukrainian subtitles, the circulation of newspapers in other languages could not be greater than of those in Ukrainian.

The bill also proposes the creation of a language inspectorate which would impose fines upon offenders. It is expected that the Rada will vote on the bill in February. As various Ukrainian and Russian commentators have pointed out, if passed, the bill will signal that Kiev has turned its back on the idea of reintegrating Donbass. It could also further destabilize and divide Ukraine at a time when the country desperately needs to remain united. For these reasons, I would be astounded if the Rada was stupid enough to make the bill law. Most likely it is just a form of nationalistic posturing. We shall see.

Third, Mark Levine, a member of the California legislative assembly, says that he will introduce a bill ‘to change school curricula to include the role of Russian hacking in the 2016 presidential election. “Students need to understand how Trump’s policies are colored by the way he rose to power”, said Levine.’ Again, I interpret this as political posturing rather than as a serious attempt at lawmaking. But, it is rather sad that democratic politicians think that they can dictate history curricula to suit their own personal agendas.

Finally, in December last year, Canadian MP Kerry Diotte introduced a private members bill to ‘designate the eighteenth day of May, in each and every year, as “Crimean Tatar Deportation (‘Sürgünlik’) Memorial Day” in recognition of the mass deportation of the Crimean Tatars in 1944.’ That this was a Russia-bashing initiative, rather than a matter of historical record, was clear from the speeches of some of the MPs who backed it. ‘This memorial day will be part of the international effort to counter Russian propaganda, which seeks to rewrite this region’s history and wipe out every trace of Crimean Tatars’, said Tom Kmiec MP. ‘Putin has embarked on a policy of imperial expansion into neighbouring countries and the rehabilitation of the cult of Stalin. Seductively beautiful Crimea has truly become a “Peninsula of Fear” for the indigenous people of this “Blessed Land”,’ said Borys Wrzesnewskyi MP. And so on.

Fortunately, this last piece of legislation failed when the House of Commons refused to allow it a second reading. Let us hope that a similar fate awaits the others laws above.

One thought on “Bad legislation”

  1. “First up is a bill before the Russian Duma to decriminalize certain acts of domestic violence. “

    Only it does not “decriminalize domestic violence”. But you have to agree – with such a catchy headline about dem violent, savage Russkis, you’ll sure get lots of attention!

    Russia is against the so-called “juvenal justice”, especially the one pushed down by the foreign NGOs and NCOs, who have zero desire to do anyting good for Russia. But, if you like to hear a real explanation, be my guests.

    Yes, our State Duma recently adopted a law that downgrades first-time domestic violence from a criminal offense to an administrative one, which caused our so-called liberal opposition (and all handshakable Media sources) to go absolutely b… allistic. This makes for an arguably more internally consistent criminal code then before, since what used to be the case is that (A) first-time assault on a random person on the street would be classified as an administrative offence in the absence of aggravating factors (i.e. when, say, I would punch someone for daring to doubt the artistic genius of Mikhail Krug), but (B) the same assault under the same circumstances on a family member (i.e. when I do the same to my brother) would be considered a criminal offence for no particular reason.

    The definition of “assault” in our criminal code, AFAIK, is “any deliberate physical violence that caused pain but didn’t infict an injury,” so it definitely includes stuff like punches and hair-pulling, which would probably be equivalent to a “non-aggravated battery” in the US, which I think doesn’t qualify it as a felony, which is more or less the definition of a “criminal offense” in Russia. So, basically, what the Duma did is that now first-time non-aggravated battery towards family members got downgraded from a felony to a misdemeanor. But this is not a “decriminalization”.

    I, myself, don’t think that a guy getting into a fistfight with somebody should be get himself charged with a criminal offence right off the bat. But, if he’s doing that as part of a gang, or out of ethnic hatred, or if he actually manages to hurt (to the point of medical attention needed) the person, that’s a different case, but a one-off instance of mild physical violence isn’t deserving of a criminal punishment. This was my IMHO.

    Why does The Independent (owned by a former KGB agent Lebedev) get a free pass with that? Why, because of the general lack of understanding of Russian legislation! I’ve been told, that a situation (A) would probably be akin to a “misdemeanor assault” charge in the USA. Which is still technically a criminal charge, but it’s the least severe kind. I’ve been also told, that the US has nothingakin to our administrative charges, having instead “civil charges”,which are not the same thing. But, hey. who;se going to explain it in the article about Russia when the Media sphere cries for blood and hatred?

    “That in turn rather undermines the theory that everything which happens in Russia is due to Putin’s personal initiative.”

    HERESY! Blasphemy! Impossible!


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s